Social Complexity of Pazyrik Culture in Altai, 550–200 BC
Journal: Social Evolution & History. Volume 18, Number 2 / September 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.30884/seh/2019.02.04
The reconstruction of the ancient nomads' social organization based on archaeological materials reveals a number of objective difficulties. However, mass material evidence and developed methodological approaches allow, based on the experience of predecessors, presenting the level of the social complexity. The reflection of this situation is demonstrated by the history of studying the world famous Pazyryk culture. A substantial amount of objective information allowed the authors of the article to consistently solve problems of social interpretation of the existing data set and consider the consistency of the selected signs of statehood in relation to the unification of the Altai nomads in the Scythian-Saka time. Based on the several basic indicators (spatial-territorial-geographical factor; population size and density; economic and cultural types; craft activity; presence of large population consolidation centers; social stratification (including management apparatus), taxation; foreign policy contacts, sign-communicative system; worldview, etc.) it is concluded that the population of the Pazyryk were in the process of socio-political complexity formation of the indicated level.
Alexey A. Tishkin, Institute of Mongolian, Buddhist, and Tibetan Studies, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences more
Petr K. Dashkovskiy, Altai State University, Barnaul more
Introduction
The question of the political organization of the nomads of Gorny Altai during the Scythian Epoch began to be considered after the study of the famous elite funeral complexes of Katanda, Berel, Shibe, Pazyryk, Tuekta, and Bashadar (Rudenko 1952, 1953, 1960; Gryaznov 1950; Kiselev 1951; Tishkin, Dashkovskiy 2003). In Soviet archaeology, the history of the ‘Pazyryks’ was described using the traditional concepts of political genesis among nomads of the Eurasian steppes. For instance, Chernikov (1975) discussed the evolution of the social structure of nomads, including the ‘Pazyryks’, distinguishing the period of ‘military democracy’ (from the seventh to fourth centuries BC) and the period of ‘primitive statehood in the steppes’ (from the third century BC). V. M. Masson took a similar position (1976), while L. S. Yelnitsky (1977) believed that statehood among the nomads of the Scythian Epoch had a patriarchal – slave-owning character. M. P. Gryaznov (1975, 1979) and M. I. Artamonov (1977) insisted on limited social development and its military democracy type among the nomads. N. A. Bokovenko (1981) and E. P. Bunyatyan (1985) supported this viewpoint, believing that the economic and cultural characteristics of nomadic and semi-nomadic societies preconditioned the conservatism of their socioeconomic system and even its stagnation. Most scholars (Grach 1980; Akishev 1993; Savinov 1993; Martynov 1989, and others) were of the belief there existed an early class (early state) structure among the nomadic societies, including the ‘Pazyryks’. According to S. A. Vasyutin and P.K. Dashkovskiy (Vasyutin, 1998: 13; Vasyutin, Dashkovskiy, 2009), this concept best expressed the researchers' views on the specific features of the societal genesis of nomads within the framework of the general theory of transitional (from pre-class to class) societies. Moreover, this approach of the proponents of the so-called traditional views allowed for the evolution of nomadic societies from early class to slave-owning or feudal ones.
In the 1990s D. E. Anufriev's (1997) opinion on the matter found support among researchers (Vasyutin 1998: 35; Dashkovskiy 2002; Dashkovskiy, Meykshan 2015). He discussed the existence of several polity zones within a single political society in the territory of Gorny Altai during the Pazyryk period. At the same time, Nikolay N. Kradin's (1992, аnd so on) theory of chiefdom became widespread in the Russian nomad studies. Within the frameworks of this theory, the authors of this paper in their monograph concluded that the ‘Pazyryks’ went through a period of ‘late chiefdoms’ in their development, and embarked on the search for a form of early state (Tishkin, Dashkovskiy 2003: 223). In this paper, we would like to dwell in more detail on the criteria for determining statehood and the possibility of their application to the nomadic society of Gorny Altai during the Scythian Epoch.
A substantial amount of literature deals with the problem of identifying markers of statehood, including some of it specific to historic nomadic societies (Kradin 1992, 2001a, 2007; Kychanov 1997; Khazanov 2002; and others). It is important to note that in some cases the same indicators are used by researchers to characterize both ‘state’ and ‘civilization’ (Martynov 1980, 1989; Orazbayeva 2004; and others). This demonstrates both the interconnection of these concepts and the methodological underdevelopment of this problem. Perhaps this illustrates Nikolay N. Kradin's opinion (2001b: 142) that it is difficult to single out universal criteria of statehood and to formulate a single definition of ‘state.’ Within contemporary political anthropology, there are various viewpoints on the definition of the term ‘state’. These definitions use the history of this phenomenon's origin. However, almost all scholarly views fit within two principal approaches – the ‘integration’ and the ‘conflict’ approaches (Kradin 1995, 2001b; Haas 1995; Ambrosino 1995 etc.). Within the frameworks of the former approach, the state is viewed as a political system formed to address various organizational needs of a community. The second approach presupposes the emergence of the state as a means of preventing struggle for life-sustaining resources between various groups. Contemporary scholars, particularly Nikolay Kradin (2001b: 140, 210), point to the interconnectedness of these approaches to define the state as a specialized institute that governs a complex society and that has a monopoly on the legal use of force. Therefore the state, on the one hand, performs important social functions (such as protection from enemies and criminals) while on the other hand, providing the elite of the society with a wider access to resources and benefits than the rest of the population.
Among the various markers of statehood, including those applicable to nomadic societies, are the following: territorial division, population size and density, economic and cultural types, artisanal activity, the existence of large population centers (towns, and, as far as the nomads are concerned, separate districts), social stratification including the administrative apparatus, taxation, foreign contacts, an alphabetic communicative system (or script), a worldview system, the status of women, the presence of monumental architecture, etc. (Khazanov 2002; Kradin 2001b; A nomadic alternative ... 2002; and others). In this paper, we will consider these parameters separately in their relation to the ‘Pazyryk society’ to clarify whether or not the required qualitative aggregate of statehood indicators is present.
Spatial geographical factor
The Pazyryk culture occupied a fairly large territory (larger than the modern Republic of Altai) and had a fairly rigid boundary, marked by funerary-commemorative complexes. Within the limits of Gorny Altai, which is characterized by specific orographic and climatic features, several landscape zones can be distinguished. Among them are steppe areas (insular steppes and valleys), taiga, alpine meadows, and foothills (Kiryushin, Tishkin 1997: 93–98). Most ‘royal’ and ‘elite’ funeral complexes are concentrated in Central Altai (Kiryushin, Stepanova, Tishkin 2003: fig. 3), which suggests that this area was the center of the ‘Pazyryk’ society. Many archaeological sites have been registered and studied in Southeastern Altai, as well as in the parts of the vast cultural and historical region (Kiryushin, Stepanova, Tishkin 2003: figs 4, 5). Some boundaries of the Pazyryk culture were situated at the junction of mountains and foothills (Dashkovskiy 2016, 2017; Tishkin, 2019 and others) or were marked by impassable mountain ranges. It is possible that they were well-guarded.
population Size and density
Current methods for calculating population are based on various factors, mainly environmental ones (Zhelezchikov 1984; Gavrilyuk 1999; Tortika, Mikheev, Kortiev 1994; Kradin 2001a; and others). These methods provide provisional results. Nonetheless, they make it possible to register historical trends. Calculations of this type have not been performed for the nomadic populations of Gorny Altai, except for some specific regions in the middle and lower reaches of the Katun River (Mironov 1998). These results, however, need to be clarified and adjusted since Mironov applied B. F. Zhelezchikov's methodology, in which other scholars identified several serious flaws (Khaldeev 1987; Kradin 2001a: 73). Population density during the Pazyryk period is evidenced by the presence of many funerary-commemorative complexes (more than 140 in number), from which over 600 objects have already been studied (Kiryushin, Stepanova, Tishkin 2003; Tishkin, Dashkovskiy 2003). The highest concentration of burial mounds was recorded in several zones in the valleys of the rivers Katun, Chuya, Ursul, Argut, Chulyshman, Bukhtarma, Koksu, Charysh and their tributaries (Kiryushin, Stepanova, Tishkin 2003), as well as on the Ukok plateau (Molodin et al. 2004).
Economic and cultural types
Research (Shulga 1994, 2015; Tishkin,
Dashkovskiy 2003: 207–214; and others) has shown that during the period under
consideration there were several economic and cultural types, which matched one
another quite well: nomadic cattle-breeding, sedentary agricultural
cattle-breeding and hunting-gathering economies all existing within the
corresponding landscape zones. The predominant economic type in Altai during
the Scythian Epoch can be described as free-range cattle breeding in the
mountains and valleys. This was also typical for the regions of Tuva, Tien
Shan, and Pamir. Cattle-breeding adapted to the specific conditions of
mountains and mountain valleys was its basis (Martynov 1986: 11–14). The
leading position in the structure of the herd belonged to the horse. The development
of horse-breeding was helped along not only by the needs of the population and the
relatively favorable natural and climatic conditions, but also by the biology
of these animals. Horses were practical to breed because they could be kept
year round in the open air on pasture. This development made use of an
efficient organization scheme for the entire extensive process of keeping and
breeding animals, which survives to this day (Kiryushin, Tishkin 1997:
102–104). The relative efficiency of economic activity contributed not only to
the dignified existence of members of society but also to the output of surplus
product and the enrichment of the top layer[s] of society. This is illustrated
by the specific features
of the Pazyryk funeral rite.
Artisanal activity
Like all economic activity during the Pazyryk period, crafting was based on home production, a special form of industrial labor (Kolchin, Saiko 1981: 24), involving the processing of materials and raw materials in the homestead that produces them (Gavrilyuk 1989: 3). At the same time, the ‘Pazyryks’ displayed a tendency to transform individual industries into independent specialized types of craft activity (Dashkovskiy 2005), almost importantly, metallurgy and metalworking. The study of metal objects has shown that nomads knew various methods of processing metal products (tinning, amalgamating, and so on) using the rich deposits of the Sayan-Altai polymetallic center (Kundo, Shcherbakov, Roslyakova 2000: 176–187) as a raw materials base. The manufacture of various ceramic vessels (Kiryushin, Stepanova 2004), woolen and linen fabrics and clothes sewn from them (Glushkova 2000: 158–161; Polosmak 2001; Polosmak, Barkova 2005), along with bone carving (Borodovsky 1997: 121–129) and woodworking (Mylnikov 1999; Samashev, Mylnikov 2004; and others) were widespread among the population. Additionally, the monumental architecture of elite funerary and commemorative complexes (Gryaznov 1950; Rudenko 1953, 1960; and others) requires a versatile knowledge base and skills. Artistic handicrafts that developed following the needs of society occupy a special place in the Pazyryk culture.
The existence of large population centers
For obvious reasons, the Altai nomads of the Scythian Epoch did not have urban centers. Nevertheless, researchers have identified some comparatively large settlement complexes (Shulga 2015), though questions about their cultural and chronological affiliation have not yet been fully resolved (Abdulganeev 1998; Dashkovskiy 1998). As noted earlier, it is possible to single out several polity zones where populations were concentrated in the region under study (Anufriev 1997). The main indicator marking such zones is the presence of the so-called ‘royal’ and elite funerary-commemorative complexes around which numerous other monuments/burials were gathered. The following territories with such concentrations can be identified in Gorny Altai: the Ursulskaya (central) group, including the Ursul Basin and the middle reaches of the Katun River with the Ulita, Shibe, Talda, Tuekta, Kurota, Bashadar, Boochi, Nizhnyaya Sooru, Ker Kechu and other necropolises (Kiryushin, Stepanova, Tishkin 2003: fig. 3); the Chuyskaya (southeastern and eastern) group – the basins of the Chuya and the Chulyshman with the Pazyryk burial ground; the Bukhtarminskaya (southwestern) group formed around the Berel site in the upper reaches of the Bukhtarma (Samashev 2011); the Ukokskaya (southern) group of monuments is close to the previous one and is located in the Argut Basin, on the Ukok Plateau, and in the adjacent regions of Northwestern Mongolia with the ‘elite’ necropolises Ak-Alakha-1, 3 and Kuturguntas. One can also distinguish the Charyshskaya (northwestern) group with the complex in the Szentelek valley (Shulga 2000) as well as Katanda and Kastakhta monuments, which tend to the central group of sites (Kiryushin, Stepanova, Tishkin 2003: fig. 3). Based on a study of the geographical location of the Pazyryk sites D. E. Anufriev (1997) identified five tribal centers. Without precluding this, it is nevertheless necessary to more narrowly pinpoint the formation period of the alleged local polity zones.
It is important to note that the population of Gorny Altai was multiethnic during this period. This is evidenced by materials used in funeral rites (Marsadolov 1996; Kubarev 1987; Surazakov 1988; Tishkin, Dashkovskiy 2003; and others) as well as, by anthropological studies of various ethnic groups living in some areas of Gorny Altai, and of their mixing (Chikisheva, 2001; 2003; 2012; Tur 1999, 2003). It was probably the elite ethnos that played the role of a consolidating force, developing material and spiritual values and exerting considerable influence in all spheres of life. The presence of this indicator is demonstrated by various characteristics, but we consider the main manifestation to be the implementation of the funeral rites according to dominant ‘Pazyryk’ patterns.
Social stratification and administrative apparatus
The social organization of nomadic society was based on a sex-age structure that determined the place of an individual depending on their physical-genetic characteristics. The vertical hierarchy was based on property, professional rank, and other factors. Unlike earlier Scythian times, during the Pazyryk period, there was a high degree of militarization of society and possibly the formation of a squad. Aside from that, a new social category, that of the ‘ministers of religion’ began forming among the nomads, though some ritual activities were still performed by the heads of patriarchal families or clans. It is important to note that ‘Pazyryk’ society was characterized by a high social status of women (Polosmak 2001). Available data suggest that women were equal to men in the running of their household and, possibly, during certain times when the men were absent (because of warfare or hunting) it was the women who bore the sole responsibility for livestock and protection of their territory (Tishkin, Dashkovskiy 2003: 195–207). Furthermore, women were allowed access to sacred knowledge based on the fact that in the burials of so-called ministers of faith, archaeologists recovered mostly female remains (Dashkovskiy 2018).
Elites played an important role in the development of nomadic society (Tishkin 2005; Dashkovskiy, 2015). These included representatives of the ruling, clerical, and military strata. They determined the sociocultural dynamics of the nomadic society in virtually all spheres of life (Dashkovskiy 2005). Taking the multiethnic character of the Pazyryk nomadic association into account, we conclude that an alien ethnic group controlled the rest of the population. A substantial labor force was required to satisfy the numerous needs of the elite. This labor force could be made up of the ranks of dependent people (prisoners of war, slaves, impoverished people, etc.). An administrative apparatus was needed to organize and control these people/laborers, as well as to maintain order in the confederation. Research carried out by the authors revealed a complex hierarchy within ‘Pazyryk’ society (Tishkin, Dashkovskiy 2003).
Taxation
Determining the specific forms of taxation and the distribution of material wealth (spoils of war) in nomadic societies is a complex undertaking (Kradin 1992, 2001a; Khazanov 2002, and others). There existed various forms of taxation or ‘duties’. The construction of large funerary-commemorative complexes required substantial human resources. For instance, the construction of the Second Badashar mound required 3000–3500 labor-days, not counting animal draught power (Rudenko 1952: 55–56). M.P. Gryaznov's viewpoint regarding this issue is interesting. Having carefully studied the materials from the First Pazyryk mound he suggested that the burial contained ‘…gifts to the tribal chieftain from ten leaders of clans.’ He also noted that the practice of offering gifts to the chieftain by the clan leaders existed in everyday life. This practice was the ‘norm of economic relations’ between the mass of main producers and clan and tribal officials (Gryaznov 1950: 69–71). Later research by S. I. Rudenko (1960: 240–241) suggested that the objects from the First Pazyryk mound were not gifts, but rather the personal belongings of the deceased. Nevertheless, the practice of offering gifts was widespread in the nomadic world as early as the early Scythian period (Gryaznov 1980; Kradin 2001a: 107–110, and others). The common use of other forms of ‘indirect taxation’ should not be ruled out. The presence of imported luxury goods (carpets, fabrics, household items) in elite burials testifies to the fact that the elite received significant portions of the spoils of war or income from exchanges.
Foreign policy contacts
Numerous finds of imported West Asian, Chinese, and other items in the Pazyryk mounds, as along with the militarized character of society suggest vigorous military and political activity (Rudenko 1952: 60–63; Marsadolov 1996; Dashkovskiy, Novikova, 2017). Stories about marriages between nomadic ‘rulers’ and Chinese ‘princesses’ are proven by materials from the Fifth Pazyryk mound. Furthermore, if we follow those scholars who identify the Pazyryks with the Yuezhi (Rudenko 1960; Savinov 1993; Klyashtorny, Savinov 2005, and others), Chinese chronicles are quite thorough in characterizing cultural-historical and political aspects of the development of nomads in the late first millennium BC. Additionally, contacts with eastern and western powers made the ‘Pazyryks’ familiar with statehood, leading them to borrow certain forms of such organization, depending on what their elite needed at the moment, as well as the existing opportunities and necessary conditions.
Alphabetic communicative system
In later periods, writing acts as the main medium for the transfer of sociocultural information. There are virtually no data on the existence of writing among the nomads of Eurasia during the Scythian Epoch. According to a widespread ‘information explosion hypothesis’, the art was the most important means of communication in the pre-literate period (Sher 1998). It was used to store and transmit information concerning all spheres of life of the collective The ambiguity of plots and characters in Pazyryk art, in which one can trace West Asian and Chinese influence, is well-known thanks to numerous finds in burial sites and petroglyphs (Rudenko 1961; Kubarev 1991; Perevodchikova 1994; Polosmak 2001, and others). The information load of both separate elements and syncretic images is yet to be determined. Their deciphering will require years of work. However, the presence of a ‘worldview layer’ in the nomadic ‘animal style’ and its role as a form of writing, information storage, carrying and transmission medium is already well-established
THE Worldview System
The dominant religious belief and mythology formed the core of the nomadic worldview during the Pazyryk period (Polosmak, 2001; Dashkovskiy 2002; 2011; Tishkin, Dashkovskiy 2003). Due to the peculiarities of ‘Pazyryk’ cultural and historical development, their religion was syncretic. This is illustrated by funerary-commemorative rites, customs, and beliefs. Just like in settled society/just like it did for farmers, the sacralization of rulers at the worldview and ideological levels played an important role in the life of nomads. As early as the Scythian Epoch, the ruler acted as a personification of unity and harmony not only of society but of the entire universe, since the mythological (cosmological) and the social were inseparable in it (Dashkovskiy 2007). Hence, the death of the ruler (later of the ruling clan or dynasty) meant the onset of the critical stage and the destruction of the world. The advent of another ‘king’ with a ‘heavenly mandate’ was to mark the return of order in the universe. After the funeral of the ‘king’, his burial complex acted as a symbol of unity of nomads, along with the new ruler. In many cases, the nomads began using such locations for complex ritual actions. The ‘royal’ mounds of the Pazyryk burial in Altai are an example of this. They were repeatedly used as chamber-chapels (Savinov 1997). Another example is the burial complex of Urochishche Balchikovo-3 (Shulga 2000). It should be noted that in nomadic society a burial site was considered to be a kind of model of the world (Dashkovskiy 2002; Olkhovskiy 1999; Marsadolov 2000). In this particular case, the royal burial complex acted as a kind of worldview center for the entire sociocultural association. Therefore, it is no coincidence that some scholars see sacral centers of the nomadic world in the Pazyryk necropolis (Kurochkin 1993). They also view those buried there as the heroized and deified ‘chieftains’ of the nomads (Motov 1998).
Сonclusion
Summing up, we note that the available factual data and methodological principles of characterizing statehood allow us to discuss the process of state formation among the ‘Pazyryks’ of Gorny Altai as one of the early forms of political entity. Further theoretical studies will make it possible to specify the criteria of the nomadic state and substantiate these markers with additional evidence. In conclusion we note that, according to Klyashtorny, the Yuezhi had already had their nomadic empire in Inner Asia – a multiethnic entity created by military force in the process of conquest, ruled by military-administrative methods, which disintegrated after the decline of the political power of its creators (Klyashtorny, Savinov 2005: 9, 25).
Acknowledgments
The study was carried out with the financial support of the grant of the Government of the Russian Federation No. 14.W03.31.0016 ‘Dynamics of Peoples and Empires in the History of Inner Asia’.
NOTES
* This study was supported by the mega-grant of the Government of Russian Federation (No. 14.W03.31.0016) ‘Dynamics of peoples and empires in Inner Asia’.
REFERENCES
Abdulganeev, M. T. 1998. Settlement of Maima 1 and Cultural and Chronological Attribution of Agricultural Settlements of the Altai Mountains. In Kiryushin, Yu. F., Kungurov, A. L. (eds.), Ancient Settlements of Altai (pp. 165–171). Barnaul: Altay State University Press. Original in Russian (Абдулганеев М. Т. Поселение Майма 1 и культурно-хронологическая атрибутация земледельческих поселений Горного Алтая. Кирюшин, Ю. Ф., Кунгуров, А. Л. (ред.), Древние поселения Алтая. (c. 165–171). Барнаул: Изд-во Алт. ун-та).
Akishev, K. A. 1993. The Social Structure of the Saka Society in the 6th – 4th Centuries BC. In Archaeological Sites on the Great Silk Road (pp. 45–58). Almaty. Original in Russian (Акишев К. А. Социальная структура сакского общества в VI–IV вв. до н.э. Археологические памятники на Великом шелковом пути (с. 45–58). Алматы).
Ambrosino, J. 1995. Inter-Societal Contacts and the Rise of the State: A Brief Note from Work in Progress. In Kradin, N. N., and Lynsha, V. A. (eds.), Alternative Pathways to Early State (pp. 54–59). Vladivostok: Dal'nauka.
Anufriev D. E. 1997. Social Structure of the Pazyryk Society of the Altai Mountains. In Socio-Economic Structures of Ancient Societies of Western Siberia. (pp. 108–111). Barnaul: Altai state university press. Original in Russian (Ануфриев Д. Е. Социальное устройство пазырыкского общества Горного Алтая. Кирюшин, Ю. Ф., Шамшин, А. Б. (ред.). Социально-экономические структуры древних обществ Западной Сибири (c. 108–111). Барнаул: Изд-во Алт. ун-та.
Artamonov, M.I. 1977. The Emergence of Nomadic Cattle Breeding. Problems of Archaeology and Ethnography 1: 4–13. Original in Russian (Артамонов М. И. Возникновение кочевого скотоводства. Проблемы археологии и этнографии 1: 4–13).
Bokovenko, N. A. 1981. Early Nomads according to Archaeological and Ethnographic Data. In Pletneva, L. M. (ed.), Methodological Aspects of Archaeological and Ethnographic Research in Western Siberia (pp. 50–53). Tomsk: TSU. Original in Russian (Боковенко Н. А. Ранние кочевники по археологическим и этнографическим данным. Плетнева, Л. М. (ред.) Методологические аспекты археологических и этнографических исследований в Западной Сибири (с. 50–53). Томск: ТГУ).
Borodovsky, A. P. 1997. An
Ancient Bone Carving Business in the South of Western Siberia (the second half
of the 2nd millennium BC – the first half of the
2nd millennium BC). Novosibirsk: Izdatelstvo Instituts
arheologii i etnografii SO RAN. Original in Russian (Бородовский А. П.
Древнее косторезное дело юга Западной Сибири
(вторая половина II тыс.
до н. э. – первая половина II тыс.
н. э.). Новосибирск: Изд-во Ин-та археологии и этнографии СО РАН).
Bunyatyan, Е. P. 1985. Methods of Social Reconstruction in Archaeology (on the material of Scythian Burial Grounds of the 4th – 3rd Centuries BC). 320 p. Kiev: Naukova dumka. Original in Russian (Бунятян Е. П. Методика социальных реконструкций в археологии (на материале скифских могильников IV–III вв. до н.э.). Киев: Наукова думка).
Chernikov, S. S. 1975. On the Question of Chronological Periods in the Era of the Early Nomads. In Mandelshtam, A. M. (ed.), Primitive Archaeology of Siberia (pp. 132–136). Leningrad: Nauka. Original in Russian (Черников С. С. К вопросу о хронологических периодах в эпоху ранних кочевников. Мандельштам, А. М. (ред.) Первобытная археология Сибири (с. 132–136). Ленинград: Наука).
Chikisheva, T. A. 2001. Questions of the Origin of the Nomads of the Altai Mountains of the Early Iron Epoch according to Anthropology. Archaeology, Ethnography and Anthropology of Eurasia 1: 107–121. Original in Russian (Чикишева Т. А. Вопросы происхождения кочевников Горного Алтая эпохи раннего железа по данным антропологии. Археология, этнография и антропология Евразии 1: 107–121).
Chikisheva, T. A. 2003. The Population of the Altai
Mountains in the Era of the Early Iron according to Anthropology. In Molodin,
V. I. (ed.), Population
of the Altai Mountains in the Era of the Early Iron Age as an Ethnocultural
Phenomenon: Origin, Genesis, Historical Fates (according to archaeology,
anthropology, genetics) (pp. 63–120, 182–278). Novosibirsk: SO RAN. Original in Russian (Чикишева Т. А. Население Горного Алтая в эпоху
раннего железа по данным антропологии. Молодин, В. И. (ред.) Население Горного Алтая в эпоху раннего
железного века как этнокультурный феномен: происхождение, генезис, исторические
судьбы (по данным археологии, антропологии, генетики) (с. 63–120, 182–278).
Новосибирск: Изд-во СО РАН).
Chikisheva, T. A. 2012. Dynamics of Anthropological Differentiation of the Population of the South of Western Siberia in the Neolithic – Early Iron. Novosibirsk: Institute of archaeology and ethnography SB RAS. Original in Russian (Чикишева Т. А. Динамика антропологической дифференциации населения юга Западной Сибири в эпохи неолита – раннего железа. Новосибирск: Изд-во Ин-та археологии и этнографии СО РАН).
Dashkovskiy, P. K. (ed.) 2015. Elite in the History of Ancient and Medieval Peoples of Eurasia. Barnaul: Altay State University Press. Original in Russian (Дашковский П. К. (ред). Элита в истории древних и средневековых народов Евразии: коллективная монография. Барнаул: Изд-во Алт. ун-та).
Dashkovsky P. K. 1998. The Main Problems of Studying the settlements of the Scythian Era of the Altai Mountains. In Savinov, D. G. (ed.), Settlements: Environment, Culture, Society (pp. 183–185). SPb.: Publishing house of St. Petersburg University. Original in Russian (Дашковский П. К. Основные проблемы изучения поселений скифской эпохи Горного Алтая. В: Савинов, Д. Г. (ред). Поселения: Среда, культура, социум (c. 183–185). Санкт-Петербург: Издательство Санкт-Петербургского государственного университета.
Dashkovskiy, P. K. 2002. Social Structure and Worldview System of the Population of the Gorny Altai of the Scythian Period: Synopsis of the Dissertation ... Candidate of Historical Sciences. Barnaul: ASU. Original in Russian (Дашковский П. К. Социальная структура и система мировоззрений населения Горного Алтая скифского времени: Автореф. дис… канд. ист. наук. Барнаул: АГУ).
Dashkovskiy, P. K. 2005. Formation of the Elite of the Nomads of the Altai Mountains in the Scythian Epoch. In Kharinsky, A. V. (ed.), Sociogenesis in North Asia (pp. 239–246). Irkutsk: Irkutsk State Technical University Press. Part 1. Original in Russian (Дашковский П.К. Формирование элиты кочевников Горного Алтая в скифскую эпоху. Харинский, А. В. (ред) Социогенез в Северной Азии (с. 239–246). Иркутск: Изд-во ИрГТУ. Ч. 1).
Dashkovskiy, P. K. 2007. Sacralization of the Rulers of the Nomadic Societies of South Siberia and Central Asia in Antiquity and the Middle Ages. Izvestiya Altaiskogo Universiteta 4 (2): 46–52. Original in Russian (Дашковский П. К. Сакрализация правителей кочевых обществ Южной Сибири и Центральной Азии в древности и средневековье. Известия Алтайского государственного университета 4 (2): 46–52).
Dashkovskiy, P. K. 2011. The Worldview of the Nomads of Sayano-Altai and the Adjacent Territories of Late Antiquity and the Early Middle Ages (Russian historiography and modern research). Barnaul: Altay State University Press. Original in Russian. (Дашковский П. К. Мировоззрение кочевников Саяно-Алтая и сопредельных территорий поздней древности и раннего средневековья (отечественная историография и современные исследования). Барнаул: Изд-во Алт. ун-та).
Dashkovskiy, P. K. 2016. The Burial Ground of the Pazyryk Culture Khankarinsky Dol in Altai: a Characteristic of the Burial Rite and the Main Directions of Interdisciplinary Research. Worldview of the Population of Southern Siberia and Central Asia in Historical Retrospective 9: 42–66. Original in Russian (Дашковский П. К. Могильник пазырыкской культуры Ханкаринский дол на Алтае: характеристика погребального обряда и основные направления междисциплинарных исследований. Мировоззрение населения Южной Сибири и Центральной Азии в исторической ретроспективе 9: 42–66).
Dashkovskiy, P. K. 2017. Study of the Mounds of the Scythian
Epoch at the Burial Site of Chineta-II (North-West Altai). News of the Altai State University.
A Series of Historical Sciences and Archaeology 2 (94): 226–233). Original in Russian (Дашковский П. К.
Изучение курганов скифской эпохи на могильнике Чинета-II (Северо-Западный Алтай). Известия Алтайского государст-венного университета. Серия исторические науки и археология 2 (94): 226–233).
Dashkovskiy, P. K. 2018. Servants of the Cult of the Nomads of Central Asia in the Era of Late Antiquity. Proceedings of the Institute of Oriental Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences 7: 199–214. Original in Russian (Дашковский П.К. Служители культа у кочевников Центральной Азии в эпоху поздней древности. Труды Института востоковедения РАН 7: 199–214).
Dashkovskiy, P. K. and Mejkshan, I. A. 2015. Study of the Regional Elite of Nomads of Southern Siberia, Western Transbaikalia and Northern Mongolia of the Late Antiquity (on the example of the Pazyryk society and the Xiongnu). In: Dashkovskiy, P. K. (ed.) Elite in the History of Ancient and Medieval Peoples of Eurasia: a Collective Monograph (Pp. 72–85). Barnaul: Altay State University Press. Original in Russian (Дашковский П. К., Мейкшан И. А. Изучение региональной элиты кочевников Южной Сибири, Западного Забайкалья и Северной Монголии эпохи поздней древности (на примере пазырыкского общества и хунну). Дашковский, П. К. (ред.). Элита в истории древних и средневековых народов Евразии: коллективная монография (с. 72–85). Барнаул: Изд-во Алт. ун-та).
Dashkovskiy, P. K. and Novikova,O. G. 2017. Сhinese Lacquerware from the Pazyryk Burial Ground Сhineta-II, Altai. Archaeology, Ethnology and Anthropology of Eurasia 45 (4): 102–112.
Gavrilyuk, N. A. 1989. Home
Production and Life of the Steppe Scythians. Kiev: Naukova dumka. Original in Russian (Гаврилюк Н. А. Домашнее производство
и быт степных скифов. Киев: Наукова думка).
Gavrilyuk, N. A. 1999. The History of the Economy Steppe Scythia. VIth – IIIrd Centuries BC. Kiev: Institute of arheology Ukrainian Academy of Science. Original in Russian (Гаврилюк Н. А. История экономики Степной Скифии. VI–III вв. до н.э. Киев: Ин-т археологии АН Украины).
Glushkova, T. N. 2000. Traditions of Making Pazyryk Fabrics. In: Derevianko, A. P., and Molodin, V. I. (eds.) Phenomenon of Altai Mummies (Pp. 158–161). Novosibirsk: Institute of archaeology and ethnography SB RAS. Original in Russian (Глушкова Т. Н. Традиции изготовления пазырыкских тканей. Деревянко, А. П. и Молодин В. И. (ред.) Феномен алтайских мумий (с. 158–161). Новосибирск: Изд-во Ин-та археологии и этнографии СО РАН).
Grach, A. D. 1980. Ancient Nomads in the Center of Asia. Moskow: Nauka. Original in Russian (Грач А. Д. Древние кочевники в Центре Азии. Москва: Наука).
Gryaznov, M. P. 1950. The First Pazyryk Barrow. Leningrad: State Hermitage Publishing House. Original in Russian (Грязнов М. П. Первый Пазырыкский курган. Ленинград: Изд-во Гос. Эрмитажа).
Gryaznov, M. P. 1975. Some Questions on the Chronology of Early Nomads in Connection with the Materials of the Arzhan Barrows. In: Masson, V. M. (ed.) Early Nomads of Central Asia and Kazakhstan (Pp. 6–10). Leningrad. Original in Russian. (Грязнов М. П. Некоторые вопросы хронологии ранних кочевников в связи с материалами кургана Аржан. Массон, В. М. (ред.) Ранние кочевники Средней Азии и Казахстана (с. 6–10). Ленинград: [б. и.]).
Gryaznov, M. P. 1979. On the Unified Process of Ddevelopment of Scythian-Siberian Cultures. In: Martynov, A. I. (ed). Problems of Scythian-Siberian Cultural Historical Unity (Pp. 4–7). Kemerovo: Kemerovo State University. Original in Russian (Грязнов М. П. Об едином процессе развития скифо-сибир-ских культур. Мартынов, А. И. (ред.) Проблемы скифо-сибирского культурно-исторического единства (с. 4–7). Кемерово: КемГУ).
Gryaznov, M. P. 1980. Arzhan – the Royal Mound of the Early Scythian Time. Leningrad: Nauka. Original in Russian (Грязнов М. П. Аржан – царский курган раннескифского времени. Ленинград: Наука).
Haas, J. 1995. The Roads to Statehood. In: Kradin, N. N., and Lynsha, V. A. (eds.) Alternative Pathways to Early State (Pp. 16–18). Vladivostok: Dal'nauka.
Khaldeev, V. V. 1987. How Many Sarmatians Were There. Soviet Archaeology, No 3: 230–231. Original in Russian (Халдеев В.В. Сколько было сарматов. Советская археология, No 3: 230–231).
Khazanov, A.M. 2002. Nomads and the Outside World. Almaty: Dajk-Press. Original in Russian (Хазанов А.М. Кочевники и внешний мир. Алматы: Дайк-Пресс).
Kiryushin, Yu. F. and Stepanova, N. F. 2004. Scythian Era of Altai. Part III: Funerary Complexes of the Scythian Time of the Middle Katun. Barnaul: Altay State University Press. Original in Russian (Кирюшин Ю. Ф., Степанова Н. Ф. Скифская эпоха Горного Алтая. Ч. III: Погребальные комплексы скифского времени средней Катуни. Барнаул: Изд-во Алт. ун-та).
Kiryushin, Yu. F., Stepanova, N. F. and Tishkin, A. A. 2003. Scythian Era of Altai. Part II: Funerary-memorial complexes of the Pazyryk Culture. Barnaul: Altay State University Press. Original in Russian (Кирюшин Ю. Ф., Степанова Н. Ф., Тишкин А. А. Скифская эпоха Горного Алтая. Ч. II: Погребально-поми-нальные комплексы пазырыкской культуры. Барнаул: Изд-во Алт. ун-та).
Kiryushin Yu. F., Tishkin A. A. 1997. Scythian Era of Altai. Part I: The Culture of the Population in the Early Scythian Time. Barnaul: Altay State University Press. Original in Russian (Кирюшин Ю. Ф., Тишкин А. А. Скифская эпоха Горного Алтая. Ч. I: Культура населения в раннескифское время. Барнаул: Изд-во Алт. ун-та).
Kiselev, S. V. 1951. Ancient History of Southern Siberia. Moscow: Academy of Science of the USSR Press. Original in Russian (Киселев С. В. Древняя история Южной Сибири. Москва: Изд-во АН СССР).
Klyashtorny, S. G. and Savinov, D. G. 2005. Steppe Empirea of Ancient Eurasia. St. Petersburg: SPbGU. Original in Russian (Кляшторный С. Г., Савинов Д. Г. Степные империи древней Евразии. Санкт-Петербург: СПбГУ).
Kolchin, B. A., Saiko, E. V. 1981. Features of Development and Organization of Cattle Breeding. In: Kolchin, B. A., and Saiko, E. V. (eds.) Formation of Production in the Era of the Aeneolithic and Bronze (Pp. 9–34). Moscow: Nauka. Original in Russian (Колчин Б. А., Сайко Э. В. Особенности развития и организации скотоводства. Колчин Б. А., Сайко Э. В. (ред.) Становление производства в эпоху энеолита и бронзы (с. 9–34). Москва: Наука).
Kradin, N. N. 1992. Nomadic Societies (problems of formational characteristics). Vladivostok: Dal'nauka. Original in Russian (Крадин Н. Н. Кочевые общества (проблемы формационной характеристики). Владивосток: Дальнаука).
Kradin, N. N. 1995. Introduction: From Unilinear View to the State Origin to the Multilinear. In: Kradin, N. N., and Lynsha V. A. (eds.) Alternative Pathways to Early State (Pp. 7–15). Vladivostok: Dal'nauka.
Kradin, N. N. 2001а. The Xiungnu Empire. Moscow: Logos. Original in Russian (Крадин Н. Н. Империя Хунну. 2-е изд., перераб. и доп. Москва: Логос).
Kradin, N. N. 2001b. Political Anthropology. Moscow: Ladomir. Original in Russian (Кра-дин Н. Н. Политическая антропология. Москва: Ладомир).
Kradin, N. N. 2007. Nomads of Eurasia. Almaty: Dajk-Press. Original in Russian (Крадин Н. Н. Кочевники Евразии. Алматы: Дайк-Пресс).
Kubarev, V. D. 1987. Mounds of Ulandryk. Novosibirsk: Nauka. Original in Russian (Кубарев В.Д . Курганы Уландрыка. Новосибирск: Наука).
Kubarev, V. D. 1991. Mounds of Yustyd. Novosibirsk: Nauka. Original in Russian (Кубарев В. Д. Курганы Юстыда. Новосибирск: Наука).
Kundo, L. P., Shcherbakov, YU. G. and Roslyakova, N. V. 2000. Features of Bronze Casting and Raw Materials of Metallurgy of the Scythian Era of the Altai Mountains. In: Derevianko, A. P., and Molodin, V. I. (eds.) Phenomenon of Altai Mummies (Pp. 176–178). Novosibirsk: Institute of archaeology and ethnography SB RAS. Original in Russian (Кундо Л. П., Щербаков Ю. Г., Рослякова Н. В. Особенности бронзолитейного дела и сырьевые ресурсы металлургии скифской эпохи Горного Алтая. Деревянко, А. П. и Молодин, В. И. (ред.) Феномен алтайских мумий (с. 176–178). Новосибирск: Изд-во Ин-та археологии и этнографии СО РАН).
Kurochkin, G. N. 1993. Sacral Center of Early Nomads of Altai (Archeological and Ethnographic Reconstructive Model). In: Problems of Cultural Genesis and Cultural Heritage. Part II: Archaeology and the Study of Cultural Processes and Phenomena (Pp. 93–98). Sankt-Peterburg: IIMK RAN. Original in Russian (Курочкин Г. Н. Сакральный центр ранних кочевников Алтая (археолого-этнографическая реконструктивная модель). Проблемы культурогенеза и культурное наследие. Ч. II: Археология и изучение культурных процессов и явлений (с. 93–98). Санкт-Петербург: ИИМК РАН).
Kychanov, Е. I. 1997. States
from the Xiongnu to the Manchus. Moscow: Vostochnaya literatura. Original in Russian (Кычанов Е. И. Кочевые государства
от гуннов до маньчжуров. Москва: Восточная литература).
Marsadolov, L. S. 1996. The History and Results of the Study of Archaeological Sites of Altai in the 8th – 4th Centuries BC (from the beginnings to the beginning of the 80s of the 20th Century). Sankt-Peterburg: Hermitage. Original in Russian (Марсадолов Л. С. История и итоги изучения археологических памятников Алтая VIII–IV веков до н.э. (от истоков до начала 80–х годов XX века). Санкт-Петербург: Государственный Эрмитаж).
Marsadolov, L. S. 2000. Archaeological Sites of the 9th – 3rd Centuries BC. The Altai Mountains as a Cultural and Historical Source (the phenomenon of the Pazyryk Culture): Synopsis of the Dissertation ... Dr. Cultural Studies. St. Petersburg. Original in Russian (Марсадолов Л. С. Археологические памятники IX–III вв. до н.э. горных районов Алтая как культурно-исторический источник (феномен пазырыкской культуры): Автореф. дис. … докт. культурологии. Санкт-Петербург).
Martynov, A. I. 1980. Scythian-Siberian Unity as a Historical Phenomenon. In: Martynov, A.I. (ed). Scythian-Siberian Cultural-Historical Unity (Pp. 11–20). Kemerovo: Kemerovo State University. Original in Russian (Мартынов А. И. Скифо-сибирское единство как историческое явление. Мартынов, А. И. (ред.) Скифо-сибирское культурно-историческое (с. 11–20). Кемерово: КемГУ).
Martynov, A. I. 1986. On the Economic Development of the Territories of the Scythian-Siberian World. In: Vasilyevsky, R.D (ed) Historical Experience of the Development of Siberia (Pp. 11–14). Novosibirsk: Institute of archaeology and ethnography SB RAS. Original in Russian (Мартынов А. И. О хозяйственном освоении территорий скифо-сибирского мира. Васильевский, Р.С. (ред.) Исторический опыт освоения Сибири (с. 11–14). Новосибирск: Институт истории, филологии и философии СО АН СССР).
Martynov, A. I. 1989. About the Steppe Cattle Civilization of the 1st Millennium BC. In: Masson, V.M. (ed.) Interaction of Nomadic Cultures and Ancient Civilizations (Pp. 284–292). Alma-Ata: Nauka. Original in Russian (Мартынов А. И. О степной скотоводческой цивилизации I тыс. до н.э. Массон, В.М. (ред.) Взаимодействие кочевых культур и древних цивилизаций (с. 284–292). Алма-Ата: Наука).
Masson, V. M. 1976. Economy and Social Structure of Ancient Societies. Leningrad: Nauka. Original in Russian (Массон В. М. Экономика и социальный строй древних обществ. Ленинград: Наука).
Mironov, V. S. 1998. On the Question of the Population of the Valley of the Middle Katun in the Scythian Time. In: Danilov, S. V. (ed.) Archaeology and Ethnography of Siberia and the Far East (Pp. 58–60). Ulan-Ude: BGU. Original in Russian (Миронов В.С. К вопросу о численности населения долины средней Катуни в скифское время. Данилов, С.В. (ред.) Археология и этнография Сибири и дальнего Востока (с. 58–60). Улан-Удэ: Изд-во Бурят. ун-та)
Molodin, V. I., Polosmak, N. V., Novikov, A. V., Bogdanov, Е. S., Slyusarenko, I. Yu. and Cheremisin, D. V. 2004. Archaeological Sites of the Ukok Plateau (the Altai Mountains). Novosibirsk: Institute of archaeology and ethnography SB RAS. Original in Russian (Молодин В. И., Полосьмак Н. В., Новиков А. В., Богданов Е. С., Слюсаренко И. Ю., Черемисин Д. В. Археологические памятники плоскогорья Укок (Горный Алтай). Новосибирск: Изд-во Ин-та археологии и этнографии СО РАН).
Motov, Yu. A. 1998. Heroization and Deification of the Leaders of the Early Nomads of Altai (based on the materials of the Pazyryk burial ground). In: Military Art of the Nomads of Central Asia and Kazakhstan (the era of antiquity and the Middle Ages) (Pp. 28–48). Almaty. Original in Russian (Мотов Ю .А. Героизация и обожествление вождей ранних кочевников Алтая (по материалам могильника Пазырык). Военное искусство кочевников Центральной Азии и Казахстана (эпоха древности и средневековья) (с. 28–48). Алматы).
Mylnikov V. P. 1999. Wood
Processing by the Carriers of the Pazyrykskjaya Culture. Novosibirsk:
Institute of archaeology and ethnography SB RAS.
Original in Russian (Мыльников В. П.
Обработка дерева носителями пазырыкской культуры. Новосибирск: Изд-во Ин-та
археологии и этнографии СО РАН).
Olhovskiy, V. S. 1999. To the Study of Scythian Ritualism: a Posthumous Journey. In: Gulyaev,V. I., Kamenetsky, I. S., and Ol`khovsky V. S. (eds.) The funeral Rite. Reconstruction and Interpretation of Ancient Ideological Ideas. Moscow: Vostochnaya literatura. Original in Russian (Ольховский В. С. К изучению скифской ритуалистики: посмертное путешествие. Гуляев, В. И., Каменецкий, И. С. и Ольховский, В. С. (ред.) Погребальный обряд. Реконструкция и интерпретация древних идеологических представлений (с. 114–136). Москва: Восточная литература).
Orazbaeva, A. I. 2004. The Civilization of the Nomads of the Eurasian Steppes. In: SHYGYS 1 (Pp. 65–75). Almaty. Original in Russian (Оразбаева А. И. Цивилизация кочевников евразийских степей. SHYGYS 1 (с. 65–75). Алматы).
Perevodchikova, Е. V. 1994. The Language of Animal Images: Essays on the Art of the Eurasian Steppes of the Scythian Era. Moscow: Vostochnaya literatura. Original in Russian (Переводчикова Е.В. Язык звериных образов: Очерки искусства евразийских степей скифской эпохи. Москва: Восточная литература).
Polosmak, N. V. 2001. Ukok Horsemen. Novosibirsk: INFOLIO-press. Original in Russian (Полосьмак Н. В. Всадники Укока. Новосибирск: ИНФОЛИО-пресс).
Polosmak, N. V., Barkova, L. L. 2005. The Costume and Textiles of the Altai Pazyryks (the 4th – 3rd centuries BC)]. Novosibirsk: Infoli. Original in Russian (Полосьмак Н. В., Баркова Л. Л. Костюм и текстиль пазырыкцев Алтая (IV–III вв. до н.э.). Новосибирск: Инфолио).
Rudenko, S. I. 1952. The Altai Mountains Finds and Scythians. Moscow; Leningrad: Academy of Science of the USSR Press. Original in Russian (Руденко С. И. Горно-алтайские находки и скифы. Москва; Ленинград: Изд-во АН СССР).
Rudenko, S. I. 1953. Culture of the Population of the Altai Mountains in the Scythian Time. Moscow; Leningrad: Academy of Science of the USSR Press. Original in Russian (Руденко С. И. Культура населения Горного Алтая в скифское время. Москва; Ленинград: Изд-во АН СССР).
Rudenko, S. I. 1960. Culture of the Population of the Сentral Altai s in the Scythian Time. Moscow; Leningrad: Academy of Science of the USSR Press. In Russian (Руденко С. И. Культура населения Центрального Алтая в скифское время. Москва; Ленинград: Изд-во АН СССР).
Rudenko, S. I. 1961. The Art of Altai and Western Asia (mid I millennium BC)]. Moscow: Izdatelstvo Vostochnoj literatury. In Russian (Руденко С. И. Искусство Алтая и Передней Азии (середина I тыс. до н.э.). Москва: Изд-во Восточной литературы).
Samashev, Z. 2011. Berel. Almaty: Tajmas. In Russian (Самашев З. Берел. Алматы: Таймас).
Samashev, Z. S. and Mylnikov, V.P. 2004. Woodworking at the Ancient Pastoralists of Kazakh Altai. Almaty: Berel. Original in Russian (Самашев З. С., Мыльников В. П. Деревообработка у древних скотоводов Казахского Алтая. Алматы: Берел).
Savinov, D. G. 1993. To the study of the ethnopolitical history of the peoples of southern Siberia in the Scythian eraю. In: Historical Ethnography (problems of archaeology and Ethnography) (Pp. 128–135). V. 4. Sankt-Petersburg: GMIR. Original in Russian (Савинов Д.Г. К изучению этнополитической истории народов Южной Сибири в скифскую эпоху. Историческая этнография (проблемы археологии и этнографии) (с. 128–135). Вып. 4.Санкт-Петербург: ГМИР)
Savinov, D. G. 1997. Burial Chambers-“Chapels” of the Great Pazyryk Barrows. In: Sacral in the History of Culture (Pp. 30–39). Sankt-Petersburg: GMIR. Original in Russian (Савинов Д. Г. Погребальные камеры-«часовни» Больших Пазырыкских курганов. Сакральное в истории культуры (с. 30–39). Санкт-Петербург: ГМИР).
Sher, Y. A. (ed.) 1998. Primitive Art: the Problem of Origin. Kemerovo. Original in Russian Шер Я. А. (ред) Первобытное искусство: проблема происхождения. Кемерово: КемГУ.
Shulga, P. I. 1994. The Economy of the Altai Mountains Tribes in the Early Iron Age. In Surazakov, A. S. (ed.), Archaeological, Folklore Sources on the History of Altai (pp. 48–60). Gorno-Altaisk: GANEEYAL. Original in Russian (Шульга П. И. Хозяйство племен Горного Алтая в раннем железном веке. Суразаков А. С. (ред.), Археологические, фольклорные источники по истории Алтая (с. 48–60). Горно-Алтайск: ГАНИИИЯЛ).
Shulga, P. I. 2000. The Funeral-Memorial Complex of the Scythian Time on the Sentelek River. In Savinov, D. G. (ed.), Sanctuaries: The Archaeology of Ritual and Questions of Semantics (pp. 215–218). Saint-Petersburg: Saint-Petersburg University Press. Original in Russian (Шульга П. И. Погребально-поминальный комплекс скифского времени на р. Сентелек. Савинов, Д. Г. (ред.) Святилища: археология ритуала и вопросы семантики (с. 215–218). Санкт-Петербург: СПбГУ).
Shulga, P. I. 2015. The Pastoralists of the Altai Mountains in the Scythian Time (based on the materials of the settlements). Novosibirsk: RIC NGU. Original in Russian (Шульга П. И. Скотоводы Горного Алтая в скифское время (по материалам поселений). Новосибирск: РИЦ НГУ).
Surazakov, A. S. 1988. The Altai Mountains and their Northern Foothills in the Era of the Early Iron. Problems of Chronology and Cultural Distinction. Gorno-Altajsk: Altai book publishing house. Original in Russian (Суразаков А. С. Горный Алтай и его северные предгорья в эпоху раннего железа. Проблемы хронологии и культурного разграничения. Горно-Алтайск: Алт. кн. изд-во).
Tishkin, A. A. 2005. Elite in the Ancient and Medieval Societies of Cattle-Breeders of Eurasia: Perspectives of Studying This Phenomenon on the Basis of Archaeological Materials. In Bazarov, B. V., Kradin, N. N., and Skrynnikova, T. D. (eds.), Mongolian Empire and the Nomadic World Book 2 (Pp. 43–56). Ulan-Ude: Buryat Scientific Press of the SB RAS Press. Original in Russian (Тишкин А. А. Элита в древних и средневековых обществах скотоводов Евразии: перспективы изучения данного явления на основе археологических материалов. Базаров, Б. В., Крадин, Н. Н., Скрынникова, Т. Д. (ред.) Монгольская империя и кочевой мир: (с. 43–56). Улан-Удэ: Изд-во Бурятского научного центра СО РАН, 2005. Кн. 2).
Tishkin, A. A. 2019. The Pazyryk Culture. In Tishkin, A. A. (ed.), History of Altai. 3 vols. Vol. 1. The Most Ancient Epoch, Antiquity and Middle Ages (pp. 243–255). Barnaul: Altay State University Press; Belgorod: Konstanta. Original in Russian (Тишкин А. А. Пазырыкская культура. Тишкин, А. А. (ред.) История Алтая: в 3-х т. Т. 1: Древнейшая эпоха, древность и средневековье: (с. 243–255). Барнаул: Изд-во Алт. ун-та; Белгород: Константа).
Tishkin, A. A. and Dashkovskiy, P. K. 2003. Social Structure and Worldview System of the Altai Population of the Scythian Era. Barnaul: Altay State University Press. Original in Russian (Тишкин А. А., Дашковский П. К. Социальная структура и система мировоззрений населения Алтая скифской эпохи. Барнаул: Изд-во Алт. ун-та).
Tortika, A. A., Mikheev, V. K. and Kortiev, R. I. 1994. Some Ecological-Demographic and Social Aspects of the History of Nomadic Societies. Ethnographic Review 1: 49–62. Original in Russian (Тортика А. А., Михеев В. К., Кортиев Р. И. Некоторые эколого-демографические и социальные аспекты истории кочевых обществ. Этнографическое обозрение 1: 49–62).
Tur, S. S. 1999. On the Uraloid Component in the Anthropological Composition of the Population of the Altai Mountains in the Scythian Period. In Kiryushin, Yu. F., and Tishkin, A. A. (eds.), Results of the Study of the Scythian Era of Altai and Adjacent Territories (pp. 203–205). Barnaul: Altay State University Press. Original in Russian (Тур С. С. Об уралоидном компоненте в антропологическом составе населения Горного Алтая скифского времени. Кирюшин, Ю. Ф. и Тишкин, А. А. (ред.) Итоги изучения скифской эпохи Алтая и сопредельных территорий (с. 203–205). Барнаул: Изд-во Алт. ун-та).
Tur, S. S. 2003. Anthropological Composition of the Population of the Middle Katun of the Scythian Time (intragroup analysis). In Kiryushin, Yu. F., Stepanova, N. F. and Tishkin, A. A. (eds), Scythian Era of Altai. Part II: The Funeral-Memorial Complexes of the Pazyryk Culture (pp. 137–169). Barnaul: Altay State University Press. Original in Russian (Тур С. С. Антропологический состав населения средней Катуни скифского времени (внутригрупповой анализ). В: Кирюшин Ю. Ф., Степанова Н. Ф., Тишкин А. А. Скифская эпоха Горного Алтая. Ч. II: Погребально-поминальные комплексы пазырыкской культуры (с. 137–169). Барнаул: Изд-во Алт. ун-та).
Vasyutin, S. A. 1998. The Social Organization of the Nomads of Eurasia in Russian Archaeology: Thesis for the Degree of Candidate of Historical Sciences]. Kemerovo. Original in Russian (Васютин С. А. Социальная организация кочевников Евразии в отечественной археологии: Диссертация на соискание степени канд. ист. наук. Кемерово: [б. и.]).
Vasyutin, S. A., and Dashkovsky, P. K. 2009. Socio-Political Organization of Central Asian Nomads of Late Antiquity and Early Middle Ages (Russian Historiography and Modern Concepts). Barnaul: Altai state university press. Original in Russian (Васютин С. А., Дашковский П. К. Социально-политическая организация кочевников Центральной Азии поздней древности и раннего средневековья (отечественная историография и современные концепции). Барнаул: Издательство Алтайского государственного университета).
Zhelezchikov, B. F. 1984. The Probable Number of Savromat-Sarmatians of the Southern Urals and the Trans-Volga Region in the 6th c. BC. – 1st c. AD on Demographic and Environmental Data. In Melukov, A. I., Moshkov, M. G., Petrenko, V. G. (eds), Antiquities of Eurasia in the Scythian-Sarmatian Time (pp. 65–68). Moscow: Nauka. Original in Russian (Железчиков Б. Ф. Вероятная численность савромато-сарматов Южного Приуралья и Заволжья в VI в. до н.э. – I в. н.э. по демографическим и экологическим данным. Мелюковa, А. И., Мошковa, М. Г., Петренко, В. Г. (ред.) Древности Евразии в скифо-сарматское время (с. 65–68). Москва: Наука).
Yelnitskiy, L. A. 1977. Scythia of the Eurasian Steppes. Novosibirsk: Nauka. Original in Russian (Ельницкий Л. А. Скифия евразийских степей. Новосибирск: Наука).